<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trampolines verse Walls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sackrider.org/category/mythoughts/trampolines-verse-walls.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sackrider.org/category/mythoughts/trampolines-verse-walls.html</link>
	<description>Attempting to Live Life On Purpose...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:59:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale Sackrider, II</title>
		<link>http://sackrider.org/category/mythoughts/trampolines-verse-walls.html/comment-page-1#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Sackrider, II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sackrider.org/?p=1719#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>Jason - thanks for stopping by, I appreciate your taking time to comment.

Maybe I don&#039;t remember the book - I wish I could find my copy! - but I don&#039;t remember him advocating that you can simply &#039;remove&#039; any dogmas you choose and keep going.  Only that ANY dogma can be examined and ONLY removed if we found it was untrue.  I didn&#039;t get from the book that he does not believe in the virgin birth - only that if it were NOT true, his faith could keep going.  I agree with that approach.

Do you believe that there are dogmas that simply cannot be questioned?  As I said in my post, if the dogma is true, then it will uphold against any scrutiny.  I also don&#039;t believe that removing the virgin birth would destroy Christianity... but that might be a different conversation...

BTW - Get a &lt;a href=&quot;http://sackrider.org/category/mythoughts/get-a-gravatar.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gravitar&lt;/a&gt; - its jacked up that I&#039;m chatting with a pink monster...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason &#8211; thanks for stopping by, I appreciate your taking time to comment.</p>
<p>Maybe I don&#8217;t remember the book &#8211; I wish I could find my copy! &#8211; but I don&#8217;t remember him advocating that you can simply &#8216;remove&#8217; any dogmas you choose and keep going.  Only that ANY dogma can be examined and ONLY removed if we found it was untrue.  I didn&#8217;t get from the book that he does not believe in the virgin birth &#8211; only that if it were NOT true, his faith could keep going.  I agree with that approach.</p>
<p>Do you believe that there are dogmas that simply cannot be questioned?  As I said in my post, if the dogma is true, then it will uphold against any scrutiny.  I also don&#8217;t believe that removing the virgin birth would destroy Christianity&#8230; but that might be a different conversation&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; Get a <a href="http://sackrider.org/category/mythoughts/get-a-gravatar.html" rel="nofollow">gravitar</a> &#8211; its jacked up that I&#8217;m chatting with a pink monster&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://sackrider.org/category/mythoughts/trampolines-verse-walls.html/comment-page-1#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sackrider.org/?p=1719#comment-2048</guid>
		<description>In my defense I am stating that I believe there are certain &quot;doctrines&quot; (dogmas is more accurate) that can not be removed without destroying Christianity.  Bell chooses these as his examples.  I don&#039;t claim to know what he was thinking but it is a bad choice or words at best.  I do agree that there are doctrines can and should be examined, that is a great deal of what my blog is about.  But it if you replace everything you no longer have what you began with, God&#039;s revealed truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my defense I am stating that I believe there are certain &#8220;doctrines&#8221; (dogmas is more accurate) that can not be removed without destroying Christianity.  Bell chooses these as his examples.  I don&#8217;t claim to know what he was thinking but it is a bad choice or words at best.  I do agree that there are doctrines can and should be examined, that is a great deal of what my blog is about.  But it if you replace everything you no longer have what you began with, God&#8217;s revealed truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
